Hormuz on edge as Trump threatens Iran with stronger strikes

BY

-

Sat, 01 Aug 2026 - 06:40 GMT

BY

Sat, 01 Aug 2026 - 06:40 GMT

Trump said operations against Iran were “going well,” adding that the United States only needed to “keep winning” - EGYPT TODAY

Trump said operations against Iran were “going well,” adding that the United States only needed to “keep winning” - EGYPT TODAY

CAIRO • AUGUST 1, 2026

Washington vowed to maintain military and economic pressure on Tehran, while Israel signaled readiness to join further attacks and commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remained far below pre-war levels.

Commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz
Hormuz at the center of the crisis
Commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains sharply reduced as Iran and the United States dispute control over navigation through one of the world’s most important energy corridors.
 
Article separator

Tensions around Iran and the Strait of Hormuz have risen again after a period of relative calm, with U.S. President Donald Trump warning of stronger strikes against Tehran and senior American officials saying Washington’s military and economic pressure campaign would continue.

Trump said operations against Iran were “going well,” adding that the United States only needed to “keep winning” until Iran is eventually forced to back down.

Trump on Iran

“What we can do is continue winning, and then something will eventually happen regarding Iran. Iran will ultimately have no choice but to retreat.”

The comments renewed concerns that Washington could resume or expand attacks on Iran, at a time when the Strait of Hormuz remains at the center of a wider confrontation over military pressure, economic restrictions, and freedom of navigation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Israel’s options

Netanyahu presents three paths forward

An Israeli official said Netanyahu presented Trump with options involving an enforceable nuclear agreement, a tighter economic blockade, or renewed military strikes against supply routes.

US vows to continue pressure campaign

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington’s efforts to besiege Iran militarily and economically would “never stop,” according to Fox News.

He said the United States would continue pursuing Iranian funds around the world and would ensure they reach the Iranian people, as well as claimants in the United States and those harmed by Iran.

His remarks came as Washington continued to frame its pressure campaign as both military and economic, including operations referred to as “Epic Fury” and “Economic Fury.”

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
Economic pressure to continue
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington would continue pursuing Iranian funds and maintaining economic pressure alongside military operations.

Washington’s pressure strategy

The United States is presenting its campaign as a combination of military force, financial restrictions, and international asset recovery.

Military operations Threats of stronger or expanded strikes against Iranian targets.
Financial restrictions Continued efforts to isolate Iranian funds and financial networks.
International pressure Coordination with allies and partners on sanctions and enforcement.
Article separator

Israel says it would join if asked

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Israel would join an attack on Iran if Trump asked Tel Aviv to take part.

His comments came as Israeli and U.S. officials continued discussions over possible paths forward in the confrontation with Tehran.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz
Israeli position

Katz signals readiness to join US action

Israel’s defense minister said the country would participate in renewed attacks on Iran if requested by the U.S. president.

According to CBS, U.S. intelligence assessments indicate that further bombing operations against Iran would not be enough to overthrow the Iranian system, which officials said remains controlled by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

An Israeli official, cited by the same network, said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented Trump with three options for the war.

Option one: Enforceable agreement

A deal focused on removing Iran’s nuclear material under enforceable conditions.

Option two: Blockade and pressure

A wider blockade combined with intensified economic restrictions.

Option three: Military strikes

Renewed attacks focused mainly on land routes used to transport supplies.

The Israeli official added that Netanyahu now understands the sensitivity of appearing to push Trump toward a particular course in the war, describing the relationship as one in which Trump is the senior partner and Israel the smaller partner.

Strait of Hormuz remains flashpoint

The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the most sensitive points in the crisis, with each side insisting on its right to control or secure maritime movement according to its own terms.

Iran renewed its assertion of full control over the waterway.

The Iranian authority responsible for managing the Strait of Hormuz said passage through the strait was not possible because of what it described as aggressive measures by U.S. forces.

It added that requests for passage would be reviewed once calm and stability are restored in the region.

At the same time, the naval command of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard rejected what it called U.S. claims that navigation through the strait was continuing normally and under American monitoring, describing those statements as false.

The command insisted that the Strait of Hormuz was closed and that any passage through the waterway would only be possible after coordination with Iranian forces.

Competing claims

Who controls passage through Hormuz?

Iran says ships can only cross after coordination with its forces, while Washington maintains that maritime navigation continues under international protection and monitoring.

Article separator

Shipping traffic remains sharply reduced

Despite Iran’s statements, maritime data showed that some commercial ships continued to pass through the strait.

According to MarineTraffic data cited by CNN, at least 15 commercial vessels crossed the Strait of Hormuz over the past 24 hours, one more than the previous day.

The data showed that 10 vessels entered the Gulf, including seven cargo ships and three oil tankers, while five vessels left toward the Gulf of Oman, including three cargo ships and two oil tankers.

Hormuz traffic in the past 24 hours

Commercial traffic remains only a fraction of normal pre-war levels.

15 Total vessels crossing
10 Vessels entering the Gulf
5 Vessels leaving the Gulf
120 Average daily crossings before the war

Before the war, the average number of vessels crossing the Strait of Hormuz stood at around 120 ships per day, highlighting the scale of disruption facing one of the world’s most important maritime routes.

The sharp decline in traffic underscores the widening economic and strategic risks of the crisis, as any prolonged disruption in the strait could deepen concerns over energy flows, shipping costs, and regional security.

Energy supplies

Prolonged disruption could affect oil and gas flows through the Gulf.

Shipping costs

Higher insurance and operational risks could increase freight costs.

Regional security

Competing military claims increase the risk of further confrontation.

A crisis with global consequences

Hormuz remains the pressure point

The latest statements from Washington, Tehran, and Tel Aviv show that the confrontation remains unresolved despite the recent period of relative calm.

With military threats rising, economic pressure continuing, and shipping traffic still severely disrupted, the Strait of Hormuz remains the point where regional conflict, global energy security, and international maritime movement converge.

 

Comments

0

Leave a Comment

Be Social